This post's title doesn't mean “look at all the grassland birds flying by
our birding observation spot.” It means we
are watching them leave Connecticut as their habitat dwindles.
The widespread decline of many grassland dependent species in
Connecticut (as elsewhere) has been well-documented and discussed. The pattern can be seen as the result of the reverse
of the environmental changes that encouraged some of these species in the decades
following the various eras of forest clearing (e.g., early agriculture,
charcoaling), as forests have reclaimed many of the few open areas that provided
suitable habitat. And, of course, modern
development pressure has accelerated the loss of habitat for these (and many
other) birds in Connecticut.
Recently, attention has been focused on a few special
species that are increasingly threatened in Connecticut by the loss and destruction
of habitat, especially by the imminent development of one of the last few nesting
sites for Upland Sandpiper and Grasshopper Sparrow, both listed as Endangered Species under Connecticut statutes. (CGS Chapter 495: Endangered means “in danger of extirpation throughout all or a significant
portion of its range within the state and to have no more than five occurrences
in the state.”)
The Upland Sandpiper was probably never a common breeder in Connecticut, at least in the Holocene epoch (+/- 10,000 years). However, Sage et al. (1913) called it "common" in the summer and cited nesting
records for “Upland Plover” from Plum Island off New London (probably Plum Island in New York), Winchester,
Torrington, and Litchfield, all prior to 1905.
Merriam (1877) called it (“Bartramian
Sandpiper”) a common summer resident, but did not cite any other breeding
records. The 1982-1986 Connecticut Breeding
Bird Atlas (BBA) confirmed breeding at Brainard Airport in Hartford and Bradley
Airport in Windsor Locks. Rentschler Field
in East Hartford was not surveyed for the Atlas.
Today, the bird is thought to nest in Connecticut only at
Bradley Field in Windsor Locks and Rentschler Field in East Hartford. And the latter site is the focus of current concern, as further development on the site appears imminent.
Mark’s observations are still timely as current plans for commercial development on the remaining undeveloped areas of the site will wipe out some of the little remaining habitat in Connecticut for Grasshopper Sparrow, Upland Sandpiper, Bobolinks, Meadowlarks, and other grassland dependent species.
The Connecticut BBA found Grasshopper Sparrows, also now State Endangered, in only eight locations, and confirmed breeding at only two sites, one of which was Bradley Airport. Sage et al. characterized the species as a “common summer resident, chiefly of the dry upper meadows, but breeding also to the borders of the salt marshes of the coast.” The species is known to nest at Rentschler Field and at other sites in the upper Connecticut River Valley. Buzz Devine has been monitoring a nesting population at a Town park in Bristol, where a former gravel quarry is reverting to a shrubby field, with the intention of developing a management plan to maintain suitable habitat.
Grasshopper Sparrow
Savannah Sparrow
Bobolink and Savannah Sparrows are listed as Special Concern species, and although they are not hard to find during breeding season, their habitat of open grass fields continues to decline in Connecticut. Eastern Meadowlark is a Threatened Species (“likely to become an endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range within the state and to have no more than nine occurrences in the state”) and shares the same habitat, but have become much scarcer in recent years; perhaps this species is more sensitive to habitat decline. The Connecticut BBA found breeding evidence for Eastern Meadowlark in almost 40% of the study blocks, mostly in the northwest quadrant of the State. Based on personal observations recently, though, nesting has declined dramatically.
Bobolink
Eastern Meadowlark
Taxes, jobs, community vitality; these are usually the
driving forces behind development projects such as that pending for Rentschler Field. But, really, it’s almost a zero sum game
since Connecticut’s population is not growing (and is not expected to in the
foreseeable future), and it's not likely that people will move to or even stay in Connecticut just for the chance to work at a Cabellas. In other words, one town’s gain is likely another town’s loss, and along the way the
ecological and environmental costs and the loss of the State’s character are borne by everyone.
Continued efforts to publicize and address the loss of biodiversity may make a difference, or may only stay the inevitable. After a career in land use planning and regulation, I've got nothing against responsible growth. But misguided, misplaced, or irresponsible growth results in more than just a loss of opportunity for birders to see some birds; it really is a loss of the State’s vitality.
In 1877, C. Hart Merriam wrote in his book A Review of the Birds of Connecticut “it is highly probable, so favorably is [Connecticut] situated, that no equal area in the country can boast a greater number of birds than may be found within its limits." Sadly, it's questionable whether future birders and nature lovers will agree.
Comments
Post a Comment